Cases 41 - 50 of 1,959
Scott v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01736
Plaintiff:
Vickey Scott
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Noel v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01387
Plaintiff:
Scott Noel
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris v. Wits End of Twinsburg, LLC et al.
as 5:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Christian Harris
Defendant:
Wits End of Twinsburg, LLC doing business as Brewsters Cafe Bistro Pub, Scott B Rafuse and Colin Rafuse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Scott v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01303
Plaintiff:
Emma Scott
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Solly v. Hoying et al
as 2:2024cv01249
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Solly
Defendant:
Lisa Hoying, Annette Chambers-Smith, Glenn Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Curtis v. Lewis et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Curtis
Defendant:
Deborah Lewis, Doug Glispy, Bradford English and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Lonne v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01117
Plaintiff:
Scott Lonne and Pam Lonne
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Washburn v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Scott Washburn
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crain v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Scott Crain
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
