Cases 41 - 50 of 1,359
Chatman v. WellPath et al
as 2:2024cv02014
Plaintiff:
Darrington R. Chatman
Defendant:
WellPath, Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Wilson/Massigale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center
as 2:2024cv02100
Plaintiff:
Pierre M. Jones
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calvin v. 201 Poplar Shelby County Jail
as 2:2024cv02098
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Marquez Calvin
Defendant:
201 Poplar Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center Prosecutor's Office et al
as 2:2023cv02762
Petitioner:
Courtney Perry
Respondent:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center Prosecutor's Office, Debbie Nichols, Bill Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02765
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Marilyn Donald, et al v. Bonner, et al
as 2:2023cv02738
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Kirk Fields, Shelby County and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Donald and Charles Donald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Joiner v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02778
Plaintiff:
Antonio Labaron Joiner
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
