Cases 41 - 50 of 18,231
Timco
as 2:2024mc50923
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, United States Department of Defense, United States Social Security Administration and others
Unknown:
Kyle Timco
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Johnson v. USA
as 2:2024cv12039
Petitioner:
Marcus Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Payne v. USA
as 2:2024cv11982
Petitioner:
Christopher Payne
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gill v. USA
as 2:2024cv11944
Petitioner:
Joseph Gill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sinnawi v. USA
as 2:2024cv11971
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael K Sinnawi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thomas v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00126
Petitioner:
Kai Raymone Thomas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gant v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00754
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Eric Gant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
McGuire v. H. George Levy, M.D., P.C. et al
as 2:2024cv11862
Defendant:
H. George Levy, M.D., P.C., Tru Dental Michigan, PC Doing business as Tru Family Dental - Temperance, H. George Levy and others
Plaintiff:
Peggy McGuire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Davis v. USA
as 2:2024cv11855
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jeffery Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Santo v. Federal Reserve Bank et al
as 2:2024cv11842
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Reserve Bank
Plaintiff:
Paul Santo
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
