Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Mark Reed-Bey v. George Pramstaller, et al
as 08-1774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY REED-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE PRAMSTALLER, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, BUREAU OF HEALTH CARE MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Defendant:
CAROLYNN DUBUC, ANDREW JACKSON, JUSTINA NZUMS and others
Brian Warren v. Andrew Jackson
as 08-1712
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN A. WARREN, aka Brian Andr'e Warren
Respondent - Appellee:
ANDREW JACKSON, Warden
Cortez Davis v. Andrew Jackson
as 08-1717
Petitioner - Appellant:
CORTEZ ROLAND DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
ANDREW JACKSON, Warden
Robert Person v. Andrew Jackson
as 08-1556
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT PERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ANDREW JACKSON, Warden
Lender License, Inc. et al v. Mortgage Insurance Agency, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv11711
Plaintiff:
Lender License, Inc., Strategists, Inc. and EZ Quals, Inc.
Defendant:
Mortgage Insurance Agency, Inc., Andrew Jackson, David Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Larry Moorer v. Andrew Jackson
as 08-1520
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY MOORER
Respondent - Appellee:
ANDREW JACKSON, Warden
Green v. Correctional Medical Services, Incoporated et al
as 2:2008cv11233
Plaintiff:
Maurice Green and Maurice Green
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Incoporated, Beasley, Cornell Howard and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Kenneth Smith v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 08-1194
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. CARUSO, ANDREW JACKSON, SCOTT NOBLES and others
Manzell Sampson v. Andrew Jackson
as 08-1027
Petitioner - Appellant:
MANZELL SAMPSON
Respondent - Appellee:
ANDREW JACKSON, Warden, Warden
Jackson #290150 v. Phillips
as 1:2007cv01083
Petitioner:
Tyrone Andrew Jackson #290150
Respondent:
Thomas G. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
