Cases 51 - 60 of 190
Christopher White v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-1091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ALLEN WHITE
Defendant / Appellee:
DANA NESSEL, Attorney General for the State of Michigan and MICHAEL G. FREZZA, Criminal Trials and Appeals
Houston et al v. US Department of Justice et al
as 2:2022cv13036
Plaintiff:
Sean Houston, Romaine Kristini Davenport Trust and Sean Houston [E-filer]
Defendant:
US Department of Justice, US Department of Treasury, US Department of Interior and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Barnaby v. Michigan State Government et al
as 1:2022cv01146
Plaintiff:
Owen W. Barnaby
Defendant:
Michigan State Government, Gretchen Whitmer, Jennifer Granhomlm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Nessel v. Laujor Estate Winery, LLC
as 2:2022cv12832
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel
Defendant:
Laujor Estate Winery, LLC
Nessel v. FKI Hardware, Inc.
as 1:2022cv01014
Defendant:
FKI Hardware, Inc., Hickory Hardware, Inc., Belwith International, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
State of Michigan and Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
Barnaby v. Michigan State Government et al
as 2:2022cv12387
Plaintiff:
Owen W. Barnaby
Defendant:
Michigan State Government, Gretchen Whitmer, Jennifer Granholm and others
Donald Rouse v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 22-1777
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD ROUSE
Defendant / Appellee:
DANA NESSEL, Michigan Attorney General, ROBERT PAUL VIAR, Michigan Assistant Attorney General and DENNIS JAMES, Michigan Attorney General Special Agent
Kensu v. Nessel
as 2:2022cv11834
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Defendant:
Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
