Cases 51 - 60 of 81
Chowdhury v. Henry Ford Health System et al
as 2:2013cv12984
Plaintiff:
Abdul M Chowdhury
Defendant:
Henry Ford Health System, Mike Smith, K Kalonich and others
Howard Martin v. Ohio, et al
as 13-3733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD E. MARTIN, III
Defendant - Appellee:
OHIO, JUDGE LISA C. ALLEN and HAMILTON COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER
Chesler v. City of Fairview Park, Ohio et al
as 1:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
Mark Chesler
Defendant:
City of Fairview Park, Ohio , John E. Martin , Jeffrey M Jurcak and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rowlery, Jr. v. Genesee, County of, et al
as 2:2012cv15292
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rowlery, Jr.
Defendant:
Genesee, County of, Robert Winston, David Schmieder and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Martin v. Ohio State of et al
as 1:2012cv00650
Plaintiff:
Howard E. Martin, III
Defendant:
Ohio State of, Judge Lisa C. Allen and Hamilton County Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren Monday, et al v. Henry Meyer, III, et al
as 11-4460
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARREN MONDAY, CHRISTINE MONDAY and WILLIAM KAPLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY L. MEYER, III, THOMAS C. STEVENS, JEFFREY B. WEEDEN and others
Warren Monday, et al v. Henry Meyer, III, et al
as 11-4460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN MONDAY, CHRISTINE MONDAY and WILLIAM KAPLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
HENRY L. MEYER, III, THOMAS C. STEVENS, JEFFREY B. WEEDEN and others
Jones v. Spring Valley Bank et al
as 1:2011cv00896
Plaintiff:
Tiffany D. Jones
Defendant:
Spring Valley Bank , Gerald J. Robinson , Steven E. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. AT & T Integrated Disability Service Center
as 3:2011cv00400
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Martin
Defendant:
AT&T Integrated Disability Service Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
