Cases 51 - 60 of 64
R+L Carriers Inc v. SMARTLogix
as 1:2009cv00180
Plaintiff:
R+L Carriers Inc, R+L Carriers Inc and R+L Carriers Inc
Defendant:
SMARTLogix
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
R&L Carriers, Inc. v. Profit Tools, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00178
Plaintiff:
R&L Carriers, Inc., R&L Carriers, Inc. and R&L Carriers, Inc.
Defendant:
Profit Tools, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
R+L Carriers, Inc. v. Microdea, Inc
as 1:2009cv00179
Plaintiff:
R+L Carriers, Inc., R+L Carriers, Inc. and R+L Carriers, Inc.
Defendant:
Microdea, Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
R+L Carriers, Inc. v. Pegasus Transtech Corp.
as 1:2009cv00177
Plaintiff:
R+L Carriers, Inc., R+L Carriers, Inc. and R+L Carriers, Inc.
Defendant:
Pegasus Transtech Corp.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
R&L Carriers, Inc. v. Interstate Distributor Company
as 1:2008cv00805
Plaintiff:
R&L Carriers, Inc. and R&L Carriers, Inc.
Defendant:
Interstate Distributor Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
F.M. Machine Co. v. R&L Carriers, Inc.
as 5:2008cv02358
Plaintiff:
F.M. Machine Co. and F.M. Machine Co.
Defendant:
R&L Carriers, Inc. and R&L Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ambrose et al v. R&L Carriers, Corp. et al
as 3:2008cv00672
Petitioner:
Randall Ambrose, Sr. and Sharon S. Ambrose
Respondent:
R&L Carriers, Corp., Ralph Roberts, Karen Cregear and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ambrose et al v. R&L Carriers, Corp. et al
as 3:2008mc00143
Plaintiff:
Randall Ambrose, Sr. and Sharon S. Ambrose
Defendant:
R&L Carriers, Corp., Ralph Roberts, Karen Cregear and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
