Cases 61 - 70 of 127
Walsh et al v. Durrani et al
as 1:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
Tracey Walsh and Gerald Walsh
Defendant:
Abubakar Atiq Durrani , Center For Advanced Technologies, Inc. , West Chester Hospital, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schock v. Durrani et al
as 1:2016cv00058
Plaintiff:
Susan Schock and Paul Schock
Defendant:
Abubakar Atiq Durrani, Center For Advanced Technologies, Inc., West Chester Hospital, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ealy v. Barrett et al
as 3:2015cv00351
Petitioner:
Lance Ealy
Respondent:
Barrett, United States Marshall Service and Sherrif Richard Jones - Butler County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ealy v. Jones et al
as 3:2015cv00308
Petitioner:
Lance Ealy
Defendant:
Richard K. Jones, Michael R. Barrett and Alex Sistla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pettus-Brown v. Cooper et al
as 1:2015cv00539
Plaintiff:
LaShawn R. Pettus-Brown
Defendant:
Ethna M. Cooper , Joseph T. Deters , Jim Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Mohr et al
as 2:2015cv02460
Plaintiff:
Joshua Barrett
Defendant:
Gary C Mohr, Martinez, Ginn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EALY et al v. DLOTT et al
as 3:2015cv00169
Plaintiff:
LANCE Q. ELLIS EALY, Larry E Ealy and SCLG-LLC
Defendant:
SUSAN DLOTT, Michael R Barrett, JEREMY ROSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01736
Plaintiff:
Michael Barrett, Sr.
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrett v. The ADT Corporation
as 2:2015cv01348
Plaintiff:
Andrew Barrett
Defendant:
The ADT Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kendle v. WHIG Enterprises, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01295
Plaintiff:
John F Kendle
Defendant:
WHIG Enterprises, LLC, RxPro Mississippi, Inc., Mitchell Chad Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
