Cases 61 - 70 of 29,213
Eddington v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Amy Marie Eddington
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hughes v. SSA
as 6:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hughes, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cornette v. SSA
as 7:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Jean Cornette
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Logan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00909
Plaintiff:
Lewis O. Logan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision
Gross v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Tracy Gross
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rowan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Jermon Rowan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Meyer v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Kim Meyer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Messenger v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Lynn Messenger
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Rooks v. Commissioner Social Security
as 3:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
David Rooks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Daugherty v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00290
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Stanley Daugherty
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
