Cases 61 - 70 of 176
Burfitt v. Lawless et al
as 1:2019cv00781
Defendant:
Brion Lawless, Linnea Mahlman, Lieutenant Haywood and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence R. Burfitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barbara Haywood v. Lawrence Hough, et al
as 19-1668
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BARBARA HAYWOOD
Defendant:
PAUL EAGLE, Police Officer and LAWRENCE HOUGH, Prison Inspector/Sheriff's Deputy
Defendant / Appellant:
PETER HUBBARD, Prison Inspector
Barbara Haywood v. Lawrence Hough, et al
as 19-1657
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL EAGLE, Police Officer
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BARBARA HAYWOOD
Defendant:
PETER HUBBARD, Prison Inspector and LAWRENCE HOUGH, Prison Inspector/Sheriff's Deputy
Barbara Haywood v. Lawrence Hough, et al
as 19-1629
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BARBARA HAYWOOD
Defendant / Appellant:
LAWRENCE HOUGH, Prison Inspector/Sheriff's Deputy
Defendant:
PAUL EAGLE and PETER HUBBARD, Prison Inspector
Haywood v. USA
as 2:2019cv02078
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Stanley G Haywood, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Haywood v. Harris
as 5:2019cv01016
Petitioner:
DeShanon Haywood
Respondent:
Warden Chae Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Haywood #520756 v. Carr et al
as 1:2019cv00344
Defendant:
Daniel Carr, Chad Daugherty and Jeffrey Lehman
Plaintiff:
Michael Haywood #520756
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haywood v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
as 1:2019cv00318
Petitioner:
DeShanon Haywood
Respondent:
Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jerone McDougald v. Jeremy Eaches, et al
as 19-3390
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. HAYWOOD, C/O OSBORNE, G. GROOMS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERONE MCDOUGALD
Defendant:
MAJOR WARREN
Jerone McDougald v. Jeremy Eaches, et al
as 19-3298
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. HAYWOOD, C/O OSBORNE, G. GROOMS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERONE MCDOUGALD
Defendant:
MAJOR WARREN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
