Cases 61 - 70 of 544,196
Caldwell v. Luster et al
as 5:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Karl Jason Caldwell
Defendant:
Deputy Ron Luster and Lincoln County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bolen v. G & M Automotive Transport, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
David M. Bolen
Defendant:
G & M Automotive Transport, INC. and Deshawn Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Hodell-Natco Industries, Inc. v. Globe-Con International, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
Hodell-Natco Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Globe-Con International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dowdell v. Gaines
as 1:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
Enoch Dowdell
Defendant:
Tamika Gaines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Doe v. Mapleton Local School District et al.
as 1:2024cv00756
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Mapleton Local School District, Mapleton Local School District Board of Education, Scott Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Ferris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
Susan Ferris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Heinz v. State of Ohio et al.
as 5:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Heinz
Defendant:
State of Ohio, David Yost, Eric N. Lindsey and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
