Cases 71 - 80 of 82
Michael Clark v. Stephen Murphy, et al
as 09-2341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY CLARK
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN J. MURPHY, JULIE A. BECK, KAREN M. GIBBS and others
Facundo et al v. Morely et al
as 4:2009cv01623
Plaintiff:
Enrique Facundo and Mar D'Oro International Ltd.
Defendant:
J. Morely, Robert Johnson, Donald Habran and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sadler et al v. Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 1:2008cv00536
Plaintiff:
Lester E Sadler, Nancy J Sadler and Charles Levi Sadler
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration, Jerrel R Smith, Chris Kresnak and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Rosario v. Drug Enforcement Administration Office of Diversion Control et al
as 1:2008cv01569
Plaintiff:
Luis De Aza Rosario
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration Office of Diversion Control, United States Marshal Local District Office Northern District of Ohio, Gerald McFaul and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Paul Volkman v. DEA
as 08-3802
Petitioner:
PAUL H. VOLKMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv01059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clark v. Murphy et al
as 2:2008cv11255
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark
Defendant:
Stephen J. Murphy, Julie A Beck, Karen M Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Medicine Shoppe-Jonesborough v. DEA
as 08-3079
Petitioner:
MEDICINE SHOPPE-JONESBOROUGH
Respondent:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Gomaa v. Drug Enforcement Administration
as 3:2007cv00332
Petitioner:
Laila Gomaa
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
