Cases 71 - 80 of 144
Moffitt v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2015cv01115
Plaintiff:
Johnny Moffitt
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Mitchell Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moffitt v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2015cv01067
Plaintiff:
Johnny Moffitt
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Michael Donahue, Mitchell Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herron v. Voyles et al
as 2:2015cv02145
Plaintiff:
Keith Herron
Defendant:
D. Voyles, J. Cline, R Woolley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Miller-Herron et al
as 1:2015cv01012
Plaintiff:
Donna F. Smith Thompson
Defendant:
Nancy Miller-Herron, Kim Kail and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Miller-Herron et al
as 3:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
Donna F. Smith Thompson
Defendant:
Nancy Miller-Herron, Kim Kail and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herron v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv02008
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Herron
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. Larry Herron
as 14-1892
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LARRY DARNELL HERRON
Devon Parker v. Joe Easterling, et al
as 14-5699
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEVON J. PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE EASTERLING, Warden, Warden of H.C.C. F. In his official and individual capacity, DEANNE MILLS, Job Coordinator of H.C.C.F.; In her official and individual capacity, DOROTHY ROBERTSON, Unit Manager; In her official and Individual capacity and others
Defendant:
CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA, et al
Clayton v. Herron et al
as 3:2014cv00995
Plaintiff:
Mark Clayton
Defendant:
Roy Herron, J Gerard Stranch, IV, Alan Secrest and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Douglas v. National PTA et al
as 2:2013cv15112
Plaintiff:
Terry Douglas
Defendant:
National PTA, United States Board of Education, American Fed of Teachers and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
