Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 83
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al
as 10-5043
Plaintiff / Appellant: VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant / Appellee: JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
VIBO Corporation, Inc. v. Jack Conway, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-5043
Plaintiff - Appellant: VIBO CORPORATION, INC., dba General Tobacco
Defendant - Appellee: JACK CONWAY, in his official capacity as Attorney General, Commonwealth of Kentucky, TROY KING, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alabama, TALIS J. COLBERT, in his official capacity as Attorney General, State of Alaska and others
David A. Brys, et al v. Roderick Boutin, et al
as 10-3041
Plaintiff: ENGINTEC CORP, an Ohio Corp, LISA G. HUFF, REGGIE D. HUFF and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID A. BRYS
Defendant - Appellee: RODERICK A. BOUTIN, VINCENT MARINO, ROBERT K. JACKSON and others
Reggie Huff, et al v. Roderick Boutin, et al
as 10-3043
Plaintiff - Appellant: REGGIE D. HUFF
Plaintiff: FRANKLIN H. JOHNSON, ENGINTEC CORP, an Ohio Corp, LISA G. HUFF and others
Defendant - Appellee: RODERICK A. BOUTIN, VINCENT MARINO, ROBERT K. JACKSON and others
Franklin Johnson, et al v. Roderick Boutin, et al
as 10-3042
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANKLIN H. JOHNSON
Plaintiff: ENGINTEC CORP, an Ohio Corp, LISA G. HUFF, REGGIE D. HUFF and others
Defendant - Appellee: RODERICK A. BOUTIN, VINCENT MARINO, ROBERT K. JACKSON and others
Engintec Corp, et al v. Roderick Boutin, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-3994
Plaintiff - Appellant: ENGINTEC CORP, an Ohio Corp, LISA G. HUFF, REGGIE D. HUFF and others
Defendant - Appellee: RODERICK A. BOUTIN, VINCENT MARINO, ROBERT K. JACKSON and others
Tatham & Associates, Inc. 401(K) Plan et al v. Tuner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00724
Plaintiff: Tatham & Associates, Inc. 401(K) Plan, Tatham & Associates, Inc. 401(K) Plan, Tatham & Associates, Inc. 401(K) Plan and others
Defendant: SagePoint Financial, Inc., AIG Financial Advisor Services and Spelman & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
84 Video/Newsstand, Inc., et al v. Thomas Sartini, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-3920
Plaintiff - Appellant: 84 VIDEO/NEWSSTAND, INC., dba 84 Video/Newsstand, VINE STREET NEWS, INC., dba Adult Mart, NU PHILLY VIDEO/NEWS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee: THOMAS SARTINI, in his official capacity as Ashtabula County Prosecutor, ROSS CIRINCIONE, in his official capacity as Law Director of the City of Bedford Heights, DAVID A. LAMBROS, in his official capacity as Law Director of the City of Brookpark and others
Defendant - Intervenor: THE STATE OF OHIO
International Dairy Foods Asso, et al v. Robert Boggs
as 09-3515
Amicus Curiae: OHIO FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, INC., ORGANIC CONSUMERS ASSOCIATION, OHIO DAIRY PRODUCERS ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT J. BOGGS, In his official capacity as Ohio Director of Agriculture
Plaintiff / Appellant: INTERNATIONAL DAIRY FOODS ASSOCIATION
Plaintiff: ORGANIC TRADE ASSOCIATION
84 Video/Newsstand, Inc., et al v. Thomas Sartini, et al
as 08-4559
Plaintiff - Appellant: 84 VIDEO/NEWSSTAND, INC., dba 84 Video/Newsstand, VINE STREET NEWS, INC., dba Adult Mart, NU PHILLY VIDEO/NEWS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee: THOMAS SARTINI, in his official capacity as Ashtabula County Prosecutor, KATHARINE LANG BETTASSO, in her official capacity as Law Director of the City of Bedford Heights, DAVID A. LAMBROS, in his official capacity as Law Director of the City of Brookpark and others
Defendant - Intervenor: THE STATE OF OHIO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?