Cases 71 - 80 of 195
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Russell v. Jefferson Capital, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00114
Plaintiff:
Bessie Russell
Defendant:
Jefferson Capital LLC and Fenton & McGarvey Law Firm, P.S.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jones v. Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC (JRG2)
as 2:2015cv00342
Plaintiff:
Wilma L Jones
Defendant:
Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC and Fenton & McGarvey Law Firm, P.S.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Placke v. Grants Lick Veterinary Hospital, P.S.C.
as 2:2015cv00223
Defendant:
Grants Lick Veterinary Hospital, P.S.C.
Plaintiff:
Loretta Placke
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Keesee v. Midland Funding, LLC et al (JRG1)
as 2:2015cv00288
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Keesee
Defendant:
Midland Funding, LLC and Fenton & McGarvey Law Firm, P.S.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Yount v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC et al (JRG2)
as 2:2015cv00281
Plaintiff:
Timothy L Yount
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC and Fenton & McGarvey Law Firm, P.S.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bostic et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 7:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
Heather Bostic and Timothy Bostic
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC , Aaronda D. Wells, M.D. , East Kentucky Medical Group, P.S.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Yount v. Fenton & McGarvey Law Firm, P.S.C. et al (JRG1)
as 2:2015cv00197
Plaintiff:
Timothy L Yount
Defendant:
Fenton & McGarvey Law Firm, P.S.C. and Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
