Cases 71 - 80 of 110
Sanchez Gomez v. Thompson Brothers Drywall, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00799
Plaintiff:
Cristian Sanchez Gomez
Defendant:
Thompson Brothers Drywall, Inc. , Tavales Drywall, Bob Thompson and others
Cross_claimant:
Thompson Brothers Drywall, Inc. and Bob Thompson
Cross_defendant:
Geronimo Maya and Tavales Drywall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Sanchez v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2012cv02344
Plaintiff:
Pablo Sanchez
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Franklin v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 3:2012cv00312
Petitioner:
Antonio Sanchez Franklin
Respondent:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp23010
Plaintiff:
Cain Sanchez
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castillo et al v. Morales, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00650
Plaintiff:
Renae Castillo and Rhonda Sanchez
Defendant:
Morales, Inc. and John Doe I - II
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sanchez v. Hernandez
as 1:2012cv00333
Plaintiff:
Hector Hugo Sanchez
Defendant:
Anselmo Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sanchez v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20898
Plaintiff:
Rose Sanchez
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
