Cases 71 - 80 of 120
Lambert v. Davis et al
as 2:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
Mack Dale Lambert
Defendant:
Helen Davis, Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alex Branch v. Emmitt Sparkman, et al
as 12-60140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEX T. BRANCH
Defendant - Appellee:
HENRY MAXWELL, Watch Commander, Unit 29, In His Individual and Official Capacity, BARBARA SCOTT, Shift Supervisor Unit 29, In Her Individual and Official Capacity, ROBERT STURDIVANT, Shift Supervisor Unit 29, In His Individual and Official Capacity and others
Brown v. Epps et al
as 5:2012cv00091
Plaintiff:
Joseph Patrick Brown
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Emmitt Sparkman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Evans v. Sparkman et al
as 3:2012cv00112
Plaintiff:
Ollie Lee Evans
Defendant:
Emmitt Sparkman, Dolester Foster, Washington Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2012cv00088
Plaintiff:
Ollie Lee Evans
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Emmitt Sparkman, Unknown Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilder et al v. Epps et al
as 3:2012cv00036
Plaintiff:
Gatlin Gilder, Jr. and Geraldine Alford
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, John Hopkins, Jesse Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2012cv00003
Petitioner:
Gerri Tate
Respondent:
Emmitt Sparkman and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ross v. Sparkman
as 4:2011cv00143
Petitioner:
John Ross
Respondent:
Emmitt Sparkman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ray v. MDOC et al
as 4:2011cv00133
Plaintiff:
Michael G. Ray
Defendant:
MDOC, Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Friday v. Epps et al
as 3:2011cv00149
Plaintiff:
Warren D. Friday
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman, Jesse Streeter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
