Cases 81 - 90 of 100
Brian Alford v. J. Shartle, et al
as 08-4583
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN KEITH ALFORD
Respondent - Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE, Warden and ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY
Davis v. County of Tipton, Tennessee et al
as 2:2008cv02772
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Dewayne Davis and Kendrick Dewayne Davis
Defendant:
County of Tipton, Tennessee, Tipton County Sheriff Department, J. T. Chumley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
In Re: Samuel Benedetto
as 08-4337
Petitioner:
SAMUEL BENEDETTO
Respondent:
J. T. SHARTLE, Warden, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Walter Himmelreich v. J. Shartle, et al
as 08-4193
Petitioner - Appellant:
WALTER J. HIMMELREICH
Respondent - Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE, Warden and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Freels v. County of Tipton, Tennessee et al
as 2:2008cv02580
Plaintiff:
James Freels
Defendant:
County of Tipton, Tennessee, Tipton County Sheriff Department, J. T. Chumley and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ray Wynn v. J. Shartle
as 08-3972
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAY WYNN
Respondent - Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE, Warden
Gary Hamell-El v. J. Shartle
as 08-3863
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY HAMELL-EL
Respondent - Appellee:
J. T. SHARTLE, Warden
Laborers Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity, et al v. J T Thorpe and Sons, Incorporated
as 2:2008cv12971
Plaintiff:
Laborers Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity, Laborers Vacation and Holiday Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity, Laborers Metropolitan Detroit Health and Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
J T Thorpe and Sons, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Daniel Storm v. J. Shartle, et al
as 08-3730
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL STORM
Defendant:
J. T. SHARTLE, Warden
Defendant - Appellee:
J. FITZGERALD, ROBERT HARRIS and BRIAN BUTTS
Robertson v. Little et al
as 1:2008cv01130
Petitioner:
Timothy Robertson
Respondent:
George Little, Joseph Vernon, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
