Cases 81 - 90 of 770
Michelle Hammond-Beville v. Jeff Landis, et al
as 21-5498
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHELLE HAMMOND-BEVILLE
Defendant / Appellant:
RON CARTER, JASON SHARPE and KATHY MORANTE
Defendant:
JEFF LANDIS and CHEATHAM COUNTY, TN
Sharp v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02256
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharp v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00965
Plaintiff:
Lee Sharp
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharp v. USPS HR Shared Services Center
as 4:2021cv00520
Defendant:
USPS HR Shared Services Center and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Latausha Simmons v. City of Southfield, MI, et al
as 21-1134
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, SOUTHFIELD, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, [UNKNOWN] CURRY, Detroit Police CAT Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LATAUSHA SIMMONS
Rodgers v. APEX Roofing, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00064
Defendant:
FC Roofing, LLC, Diane Gabbard, Hugo Figueroa and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Rodgers
3Rd Party Defendant:
Felix Gervacio and Gervacio Remodelation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Glenn v. Walker et al
as 1:2021cv01013
Defendant:
Lt. Parram, Capt. Walker, Sgt. Christian and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest J. Glenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv00013
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Sharp
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Wilson v. Shelby County Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv01093
Defendant:
Lance Chism, George Allen, Abby Wallace and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Windom v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01269
Defendant:
Keith Harding, Tony Parker, Lee Dotson and others
Plaintiff:
Ronardo L. Windom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
