Cases 81 - 90 of 315
Caudill v. Doak et al
as 5:2019cv02653
Defendant:
Ted St. John, Sheriff David Doak, Hope Village and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Caudill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy Durham, Jr. v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 19-3932
Defendant / Appellee:
JUSTIN REESE, Corrections Officer, JUSTIN JOHNSON, Case Manager, JOSEPH LITTLE, Lieutenant and others
Defendant:
RUDOLPH PRINGLES, Deputy Warden of Operations, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY A. DURHAM, JR.
Reese v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv00297
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Adam Reese
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Reese v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv02615
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Erik E. Reese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davidson et al v. Snyder et al
as 5:2019cv12675
Plaintiff:
T. T.1, Tammy Woofenden, Charles L. Banks and others
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Gerald Ambrose, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Jackson v. Michael Tucker, et al
as 19-3714
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL L. TUCKER, Judge, GREGORY A. BRUSH, Montgomery County Clerk of Courts, MARY DONOVAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS D. JACKSON
Dennis Jackson v. Michael Tucker, et al
as 19-3679
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL L. TUCKER, Judge, GREGORY A. BRUSH, Montgomery County Clerk of Courts, MARY DONOVAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS D. JACKSON
Liberty Mutual v. Angelo et al
as 2:2019cv12051
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual
Defendant:
Greater Lakes Ambulatory Surgery Center, Reese James, D.O., Tox Testing, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv01331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ade Brown v. John Davids, et al
as 19-1557
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] KUTOWIKS, C/O, [UNKNOWN] ZURAD, C/O, [UNKNOWN] MONTGOMERY, C/O and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADE BROWN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
