Cases 1 - 10 of 70
In re: Roy Brownlee
as 23-2048
Petitioner:
In re: ROY EDWARD BROWNLEE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dixon v. Brownlee
as 2:2023cv12661
Defendant:
Cherina Brownlee and Cherina Olgetree
Plaintiff:
Samuel Maurice Dixon, Jr.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv12421
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Knox Trailers, Inc., et al v. Jeff Clark, et al
as 23-5218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KNOX TRAILERS, INC. and POST TRAILER REPAIRS, INC.
Defendant:
JEFF CLARK, et al.
Defendant / Appellee:
ROY BAILEY, Individually, BILLY MAPLES, Individually, AMANDA MAPLES, Individually and others
Brownlee v. DOE et al
as 2:2023cv02061
Not Classified By Court:
Jamita Swearengen
Plaintiff:
Calvin Brownlee
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Direct Chassislink, Inc. and Evans Delivery Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv10215
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Roy Brownlee
as 23-1008
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROY EDWARD BROWNLEE
USA v. Roy Brownlee
as 22-2166
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROY EDWARD BROWNLEE
Brownlee et al v. L'Oreal USA, Inc., et al.
as 3:2022cv00336
Plaintiff:
Jackie Brownlee and Jerri Peebles
Defendant:
L'OREAL USA, INC., L'OREAL USA PRODUCTS, INC., SOFT SHEEN-CARSON, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
