Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pena v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02789
Plaintiff:
Fernando Pena
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Prieto-Cruz v. Garza et al
as 4:2023cv01217
Plaintiff:
Raul Prieto-Cruz
Defendant:
Fernando Garza, Debra Giannone, J. Bolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kamal v. Garza
as 4:2023cv01210
Petitioner:
Hussain I Kamal
Respondent:
Warden Fernando Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fernandez v. Blinken
as 3:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Fernando Daniel Fernandez
Defendant:
Antony J. Blinken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lazard v. Guerrero et al
as 1:2023cv01084
Plaintiff:
Kim Lazard
Defendant:
Adrian Guerrero, Fernando Guerrero and Lauren Guerrero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Morgan v. FBOP et al
as 4:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Gemar Morgan
Defendant:
FBOP, Fernando Garza, J.C. Petrucci and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Griffiths v. Garza
as 4:2023cv00199
Petitioner:
Andrew Griffiths
Respondent:
Warden Fernando Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Monte v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv00122
Petitioner:
Frank Michael Monte
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Fernando Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
