Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Durham v. American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus et al
as 1:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Linda Perry Durham
Defendant:
American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus, James Fincher and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Wright et al v. Cook et al
as 7:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Kevin B. Wright, Pamela Wright and Hollie Bell
Defendant:
Ruth A. Thacker Cook, Integon Indemnity Corporation, American Family Home Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Robinson v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv11968
Plaintiff:
William Robinson
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company, American Family LIfe Assurance Company of Columbus, a foregin corporation and American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
American Family Insurance Company v. United States Of America
as 1:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
American Family Insurance Company
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv10498
Plaintiff:
American Family Connect Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Brandon D. Williams and Olivia J. Bellestri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Varvel v. American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus (AFLAC) et al
as 5:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
Gary Varvel
Defendant:
American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus (AFLAC) and Guardian Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 eb
BST Holdings, LLC, et al v. OSHA, et al
as 21-4080
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
BST HOLDINGS, LLC, RV TROSCLAIR, LLC, TROSCLAIR AIRLINE, LLC and others
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MARTIN J. WALSH, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor and DOUGLAS L. PARKER, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Amicus Curiae:
BENTKEY SERVICES, LLC, dba Daily Wire, NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE and AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
MCP No.165, OSHA Covid Rule
as 21-7000
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402 and In re: MCP NO. 165, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING TRADES COUNCIL, SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 32BJ, aka 32BJ SEIU, AFT PENNSYLVANIA and others
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DOUGLAS L. PARKER, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Administration, JAMES FREDERICK, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Administration and others
Amicus Curiae:
NEW CIVIL LIBERTIES ALLIANCE, AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, GAVEL PROJECT and others
Intervenor:
CHUCK WINDER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the Idaho State Senate, SCOTT BEDKE, in his offical capacity as Speaker of the House of Representatives of the State of Idaho, JOSE A. PEREZ and others
Urbassik v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
as 1:2021cv01974
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Urbassik
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
American Family Insurance Company v. International Concepts in Cabinetry, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00667
Plaintiff:
American Family Insurance Company
Defendant:
International Concepts in Cabinetry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
