Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Cook v. Hospice Care of Southwest Michigan Inc.
as 1:2021cv00377
Defendant:
Hospice Care of Southwest Michigan Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amy Cook
Roybal v. State of Tennessee, The et al
as 3:2021cv00219
Defendant:
Kim R. Helper, Tennessee District Attorney General, Rena Hill Isen and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest J. Roybal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA ex rel, Amy Cook-Reska, et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc, et al
as 20-5637
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel and STATE OF TEXAS, ex rel
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION, WEBB HOSPITAL CORPORATION, LAREDO TEXAS HOSPITAL COMPANY, L.P. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMY COOK-RESKA
USA ex rel., James Doghramji, et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc, et al
as 20-5469
Defendant / Appellee:
MARION HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Heartland Regional Medical Center, BIG SPRING HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Scenic Mountain Medical Center, CARLSBAD MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, Carlsbad Medical Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DOGHRAMJI, RACHEL BRYANT and SHEREE COOK
Plaintiff:
AMY COOK-RESKA, NANCY REUILLE, KATHLEEN A. BRYANT and others
USA ex rel., James Doghramji, et al v. Community Health Systems, Inc, et al
as 20-5462
Defendant / Appellee:
MARION HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Heartland Regional Medical Center, BIG SPRING HOSPITAL CORPORATION, dba Scenic Mountain Medical Center, CARLSBAD MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, Carlsbad Medical Center and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES DOGHRAMJI, RACHEL BRYANT and SHEREE COOK
Plaintiff:
AMY COOK-RESKA, NANCY REUILLE, KATHLEEN A. BRYANT and others
Cook-Reska vs. Community Health Systems Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02160
Plaintiff:
Amy Cook-Reska and United States of America
Defendant:
Community Health Systems, Inc. , Laredo Texas Hospital Company, L.P. , Webb Hospital Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
