Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hunter et al v. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00411
Defendant:
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation, CACI International Incorporated, CACI Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sarah Hunter, Sarah J. Hunter and David N. Yountz
Not Classified By Court:
John C Camillus
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Banks v. Song et al
as 4:2017cv01513
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sember v. Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00445
Plaintiff:
John M Sember
Defendant:
Booz Allen Hamilton Engineering Services, LLC , Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. , Karen Paulsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Reid v. Mabus et al
as 5:2015cv02055
Plaintiff:
Jesse Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, Navy Acting Secretary Stackley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Reid v. Mabus et al
as 1:2015cv02054
Plaintiff:
Jesse Wayne Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, NCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01680
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv01649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Reid v. Mabus et al
as 1:2015cv00538
Plaintiff:
Jesse Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, Stackley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Mabus et al
as 5:2015cv01639
Plaintiff:
Jesse Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, Navy Criminal Investigative Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
