Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cahill v. Memorial Heart Institute, LLC
as 1:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Stephen Cahill
Defendant:
Memorial Heart Institute, LLC doing business as The Chattanooga Heart Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Mooney v. Byrdstown Medical Center, PLLC et al
as 2:2019cv00011
Defendant:
Byrdstown Medical Center, PLLC and M.D. Cynthia Cahill
Plaintiff:
James O. Mooney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cahill-Lujan v. Coffee County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2016cv00093
Plaintiff:
Roberta Ann Cahill-Lujan
Defendant:
Coffee County, Tennessee and Nicholas Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chase v. White et al
as 3:2016cv01576
Plaintiff:
David Chase
Defendant:
Matthew K. White, Scott F. Hull, Jeffrey S. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chase v. White et al
as 3:2015cv00631
Plaintiff:
David Chase
Defendant:
Matthew K. White, Scott F. Hull, Jeffrey S. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cahill v. Aetna Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00078
Plaintiff:
Regena Cahill
Defendant:
Aetna Health, Inc. and HCA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Elevation Outdoor Advertising, LLC v. City of Morristown, Tennessee et al
as 2:2009cv00015
Plaintiff:
Elevation Outdoor Advertising, LLC
Defendant:
City of Morristown, Tennessee, Morristown Regional Planning Commission, Barbara C Barlie and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Waldemar E. Albers Revocable Trust et al v. Mid-America Energy, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00421
Plaintiff:
Waldemar E. Albers Revocable Trust, Waldemar E. Albers Revocable Trust, Waldemar E. Albers Revocable Trust and others
Defendant:
Mid-America Energy, Inc., Mid-America Oil & Gas, LLC, Gary Milby and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
