Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Maddox v. Foley et al
as 3:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Clarice M Maddox
Defendant:
Mike Foley, Mary Kathrine Huffman, Timothy O'Connell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. WDC Holdings LLC d/b/a Northstar Commercial Partners et al
as 2:2021mc51478
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com, Inc.
Intervenor Defendant:
Amazon Data Services, Inc.
Intervenor Plaintiff:
800 Hoyt LLC
Defendant:
WDC Holdings LLC d/b/a Northstar Commercial Partners, Sterling NCP FF, LLC, Manassas NCP FF, LLC and others
Interpleader:
WDC Holdings, LLC, PLW Capital I, LLC and BW Holdings, LLC
Receiver:
Mark A Roberts
USA v. Carleton McLendon
as 21-1451
Defendant / Appellant:
CARLETON MCLENDON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Carleton Buck v. City of Highland Park, MI, et al
as 17-2151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLETON BUCK
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF HIGHLAND PARK, MI, SGT. CURTIS WHITE and HEATHER HOLCOMB
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv11133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Buck v. Highland Park, City of, et al
as 4:2016cv14368
Plaintiff:
Carleton Buck
Defendant:
Highland Park, City of , Curtis White and Heather Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vincent Rhodes v. Christopher LaRosa
as 13-3976
Petitioner - Appellant:
VINCENT CARLETON RHODES
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER LAROSA, Warden
New Hampshire Insurance Compa v. William Carleton, II, et al
as 13-1979
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM T. CARLETON, II and URSULA ST. CLAIR, Personal Representative of the Estate of Layla Dietz
Carleton Kowalke v. Swiss America Trading Corp.
as 12-4125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLETON KOWALKE
Defendant - Appellee:
SWISS AMERICA TRADING CORP.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
