Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Chapman v. Leeds
as 1:2024cv01106
Petitioner:
Billie Joe Chapman
Respondent:
Chance Leeds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owens et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens and Dwayne Jordan
Defendant:
Ricky Hill, FNU Watkins, f/n/u Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Baltrusaitis, et al v. UAW, et al
as 24-1356
Plaintiff:
THOMAS BALTRUSAITIS, GUILLERMO ANTUNEZ, PATRICK BARTH and others
Defendant:
JEROME DURDEN, MICHAEL BROWN, GARY JONES and others
Eads v. Strada et al
as 1:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Darnell Eads
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Chance Leeds, Kumetris Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. TN Dept of Corrections
as 1:2024cv01069
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Linda R. Thomas, Ricky Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01389
Plaintiff:
Chance Adams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Douglas v. Whiteville Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv01049
Plaintiff:
Gregory D. Douglas
Defendant:
Whiteville Correctional Facility, Chance Leeds and Latoya Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00745
Plaintiff:
Chance Adams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wright v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Danielle Lynette Wright
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Stanley C. Dickerson, Talea Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moyer v. Nanogate North America, LLC
as 1:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Chance Moyer
Defendant:
Nanogate North America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
