Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Clayton v. Hogan et al
as 3:2022cv00936
Plaintiff:
Mark Clayton
Defendant:
Lauren Hogan, Glenn Funk, Amy Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenton v. WTVF Channel 5 News et al
as 3:2021cv00770
Plaintiff:
James Kenton
Defendant:
WTVF Channel 5 News and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duke v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2016cv02480
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Duke
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Rutherford County Sheriff Dept., Robert Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gross v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville et al
as 3:2011cv00883
Plaintiff:
Fredrick D. Gross, Jr.
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville, Davidson County Sheriff's Office, Curtis Hafley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville et al
as 3:2011cv00767
Plaintiff:
Derrick E. Bailey
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville, Davidson County Sheriff Office, Curtis Hafley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Archibald v. Face It Newspaper et al
as 3:2011cv00728
Plaintiff:
Karl Archibald, Jr.
Defendant:
Face It Newspaper, Dotson, Inc., Sheriff's Department, Davidson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayes et al v. U.S. Marshals et al
as 1:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
Keith R. Mayes, Sr., Ruth V. Mayes and Gilda L. Mayes
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals, Maury County Sheriffs Department and News Channel 5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. WTVF Channel 5 News
as 3:2008cv00761
Petitioner:
James Douglas Smith
Respondent:
WTVF Channel 5 News
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. WTVF Channel 5 News
as 3:2008mc00179
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Smith
Defendant:
WTVF Channel 5 News
Darrel Tipton v. Unicoi County Sheriff's Depart, et al
as 08-5907
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARREL L. TIPTON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNICOI COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, KENT HARRIS, Sheriff, ROBBIE SULLINS, Spokesman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
