Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Mackinac Center for Public Policy, et al v. Miguel Cardona, et al
as 23-1736
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MACKINAC CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY and CATO INSTITUTE
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGUEL CARDONA, Secretary, U.S. Department of Education, in his official capacity;, RICHARD CORDRAY, Chief Operating Officer of Federal Student Aid, U.S. Department of Education, in his official capacity and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Mackinac Center for Public Policy v. US Department Of Education et al
as 1:2023cv10795
Plaintiff:
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Defendant:
US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Miguel Cardona, Richard Cordray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Frank Miller, Jr. v. University Hosp Health System, et al
as 19-3788
Defendant:
HEATHER HARMON, Vice President, Human Services, SALLY NAMBOODIRI, MD, DEBORAH L. TEMPLIN, Director, Disability & Occupational Risk Control Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK MILLER, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM, aka University Hospitals Cleveland Health System
Steven Caryer v. Dr. Stine, et al
as 16-3632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN M. CARYER
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. STINE, [UNKNOWN] DONUGHUE, GARY C. MOHR, ODRC and others
Wesley v. Management Training Corp. et al
as 3:2014cv02683
Plaintiff:
William Wesley
Defendant:
Management Training Corp., Dr. Stine, Dr. Keeton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Unger v. Management Training Corp. et al
as 3:2014cv02622
Plaintiff:
Shawn R. Unger
Defendant:
Management Training Corp., Dr. Stine, Dr. Keeton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roush v. Talbert et al
as 3:2014cv02490
Plaintiff:
Shane Roush
Defendant:
Al Talbert, Dr. Stine, Dr. Kong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caryer v. Dr. Stine et al
as 3:2014cv02287
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Caryer
Defendant:
Dr. Stine, [fnu] Donughue, Gary Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
