Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Curry v. Tennessee Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv02541
Plaintiff:
Willie Earl Curry
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2024cv02477
Petitioner:
Ronald Curry
Respondent:
Warden Vince Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. O'Charley's LLC
as 3:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Janice Curry
Defendant:
O'Charley's LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
United States of America v. Premier Property Services LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02045
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Currie Lee Byrd
Garnishee:
Premier Property Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Hawkins v. Caperter et al
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Leon Hawkins
Defendant:
Rod Caperter, Jr., Unknown Lyhoyd, Curry Brasfield and others
Hawkins v. Carpenter, Jr et al
as 1:2023cv01269
Plaintiff:
Leon Hawkins
Defendant:
Ron Carpenter, Jr, Lylod Curry Brasfield and Cornelius Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv01305
Petitioner:
Ronald Curry
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Wardlow
as 1:2023cv01122
Petitioner:
Stacy Curry
Respondent:
Jerry Wardlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rucker et al v. Shelby County Board of Education et al
as 2:2023cv02358
Plaintiff:
Tikeila Rucker, Rachael Spriggs, Damon Curry-Morris and others
Defendant:
Shelby County Board of Education and Carolyn Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2023cv01074
Petitioner:
Devonta Curry
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
