Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ruffer v. Global Telehealth Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv02282
Defendant:
Thomas W. Swidarski, Vicky Tifft, Brian Battey and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Ruffer
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company et al v. Casey et al
as 5:2018cv01257
Plaintiff:
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company and Life Insurance Company of North America
Defendant:
Zachary John Casey, David C. Thomas and Georgianne Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Thomas v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02609
Plaintiff:
David C. Thomas
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas et al v. Riverfront Limestone, LLC
as 5:2014cv00191
Plaintiff:
David S. Thomas and Dorothy L. Harris
Defendant:
Riverfront Limestone, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 0901
Thomas v. Akron Police Department
as 5:2013cv02093
Plaintiff:
David B. Thomas
Defendant:
Akron Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Thomas et al
as 3:2013cv00052
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
David Dean Thomas, Angela Thomas and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Thomas v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2013cv10579
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Thomas
Filing Error
as 1:2012cv02974
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
David A. Thomas, Jr. and TSBG, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Violation of Illegal Interception of Cable System
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Thomas, Jr. et al
as 1:2012cv02788
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
David A. Thomas, Jr. and TSBG, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Violation of Illegal Interception of Cable System
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Thomas, et al
as 1:2012cv01641
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
David A. Thomas, Jr. and TSBG, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
