Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Davis v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02585
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr., Detective John Doe and Shelby County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Durrell Jordan Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Robert Durrell
as 23-3841
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT PAUL DURRELL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00530
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Davis v. Warden, Hamilton County Justice Center
as 1:2021cv00433
Respondent:
Warden, Hamilton County Justice Center
Petitioner:
Durrell Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Middleton
as 2:2021cv00071
Respondent:
John C. Middleton
Petitioner:
Durrell Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Middleton
as 1:2021cv00369
Respondent:
John C. Middleton
Petitioner:
Durrell Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dexter Cooper v. USA
as 21-5533
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEXTER DURRELL COOPER
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cooper v. Palmer et al
as 5:2021cv00139
Defendant:
Ofc. P. Palmer, Ofc. J. Finley, Sgt. Matthew Merker and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter Durrell Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Vaughan v. Jonathan Grate, et al
as 21-5387
Defendant / Appellee:
REBECCA BARKER, RCC Unit 3 Administrator, Law Library Manager, in her individual & official capacities, ASHLEY SHORT, in her individual & official capacities, AMY ROBEY, RCC Deputy Warden for Operations, in her individual & official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN VAUGHAN
Michael Vaughan v. James Erwin, et al
as 21-5361
Defendant / Appellee:
ANGELA FRENCH, in her individual capacity, COMMISSIONER JAMES ERWIN, in his individual and official capacities, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & WARDEN RAVONNE SIMS, in her individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN VAUGHAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
