Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Schippers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02245
Plaintiff:
Eric W. Schippers
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dubbert et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01000
Plaintiff:
Eric W. Dubbert and Kimberly Dubbert
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Sahns v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00601
Plaintiff:
Eric W. Sahns
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Comerica Bank v. Cash
as 2:2023cv10191
Plaintiff:
Comerica Bank
Defendant:
Eric W. Cash
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USA v. Eric Beard
as 22-3767
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC W. BEARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Trustees of the Michigan Laborers' Health Care Fund et al v. Superior Underground Services, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Michigan Laborers' Health Care Fund, Trustees of the Michigan Laborers' Pension Fund, Trustees of the Michigan Laborers' Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
Superior Underground Services, LLC, Kenneth Nielson, Eric W Stratton and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Fund
Eric ConleyIn re: Eric Conley
as 20-3800
Respondent:
JAMES HAVILAND, Warden
Petitioner:
In re: ERIC W. CONLEY
Eric ConleyIn re: Eric Conley
as 20-3190
Respondent:
JAMES HAVILAND, Warden
Petitioner:
In re: ERIC W. CONLEY
Madson v. Maxwell et al
as 3:2019cv01062
Defendant:
Eric W. Maxwell, Eldeco, Inc. and USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Taylor Madson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
