Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Tanika Parker, et al v. Tenneco, Inc., et al
as 23-1857
Plaintiff / Appellee: TANIKA PARKER, individually and on behalf of the DRIV 401(K) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN, and all others similarly situated and ANDREW FARRIER, individually and on behalf of the DRIV 401(K) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN, and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: TENNECO, INC., DRIV AUTOMOTIVE, INC., TENNECO AUTOMOTIVE OPERATING COMPANY, INC. and others
Defendant: DOES, 1-30, John and Jane Doe Defendants
Parker et al v. Tenneco Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv10816
Plaintiff: Tanika Parker and Andrew Farrier
Defendant: Tenneco Inc., Driv Automotive Inc, Tenneco Automotive Operating Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00059
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Siano v. Federal Mogul LLC et al
as 3:2019cv01140
Defendant: Federal Mogul LLC, Zachary Jolly and Tenneco
Plaintiff: John Siano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Siano v. Federal Mogul LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01155
Defendant: Federal Mogul LLC and Zachary Jolly
Plaintiff: John Siano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Labor Labor: Other
United States of America v. Federal-Mogul LLC
as 2:2018cv13205
Defendant: Federal-Mogul LLC
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?