Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03934
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Larry Jones v. Zachary Jenkins, et al
as 21-1678
Plaintiff / Appellant: LARRY DARNELL JONES
Defendant / Appellee: ZACHARY JENKINS, Regional Manager of Security, in his individual capacity, ROBERT JAMES SAENA, Assistant General Manager, in his individual capacity, DANIEL RALPH HERRERA, Employee of Menards, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01192
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Herman Harris, Jr. v. Aramark Correctional Services, et al
as 20-3343
Defendant / Appellee: ARAMARK INCORPORATION, CHAD KAHN, Food Service Manager/Supervisor, C. CROCKETT HARRIS, Unit Manager Administrator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: HERMAN HARRIS, JR.
Defendant: BRAD GILLESPIE, General Manager/District Manager
Feldten, LLC, d/b/a Feldman Chevrolet of Livonia, a Michigan limited liability company et al v. Portfolio Holding, Inc., a Delaware corporation et al
as 3:2020cv10592
Plaintiff: Feldkouts, LLC d/b/a Feldman Chevrolet of Lansing, a Michigan limited liability company, Liberty Hyundai of Waterford, Inc. d/b/a Feldman Hyundai of Waterford, a Michigan corporation, Feldten, LLC, d/b/a Feldman Chevrolet of Livonia, a Michigan limited liability company and others
Defendant: Standard Group Resources, Ltd., a corporation organized under the law of Seychelles, Portfolio Holding, Inc., a Delaware corporation and Portfolio General Management Group, Inc., a California corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
American Freedom Defense, et al v. Suburban Mobility Authority, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1311
Defendant / Appellee: SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION (SMART), JOHN HERTEL, individually and in his official capacity as General Manager of SMART and BETH GIBBONS, individually and in her official capacity as Marketing Program Manager of SMART
Defendant: GARY I. HENDRICKSON, individually and in his official capacity as Chief Executive of SMART
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAMELA GELLER, AMERICAN FREEDOM DEFENSE INITIATIVE and ROBERT SPENCER
Dreams v. National General Management Corp.
as 1:2018cv00988
Defendant: National General Management Corp. and Holly Wilson
Plaintiff: Catherine Dreams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Gary Bullwinkel v. US DOE, et al
as 14-6200
Plaintiff - Appellant: GARY BULLWINKEL
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, STEPHEN CHU, in his official capacity as Secretary of Energy, ANTHONY CUGINI, in his official capacity as Director of the National Energy Technology Laboratory, Dept of Energy and others
Pecola Campbell, et al v. Ronnie Bastin, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-5270
Plaintiff - Appellant: PECOLA CAMPBELL, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Roland Campbell and STARSKY COOK, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Roland Campbell
Plaintiff: CAPITOL SPECIALTY INSURANCE
Defendant - Appellee: RONNIE BASTIN, Individually and as Police Chief for Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government Division of Police, DERRICK P. WALLACE, Officer of Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government Division of Police and MATTHEW R. SMITH, Officer of Lexington-Fayette Urban County Government Division of Police
Defendant: ADULT DAYCARE OF LEXINGTON INC., LINDA HILL, Owner, KATE MCALLISTER, Assistant Executive Director/Case Manager and others
Smith v. Hochul et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00162
Plaintiff: Brian Avery Smith
Defendant: William J. Hochul, Jr., Maura K. O'Donnell, Richard Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?