Cases 1 - 10 of 31
USA v. Lamonte Brown
as 23-5610
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LAMONTE H. BROWN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Brown v. Tennessee Valley Authority et al
as 1:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Corby H. Brown
Defendant:
Tennessee Valley Authority, Southeast Woodland Services, Brian Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land
James Vance, et al v. USA
as 22-5513
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES CARL VANCE, Individually, and as Surviving Spouse and Next of Kin of Deceased May Evelyn Norred Vance, WILLIAM H. BROWN, Executor of Estate Of Elaine H. Brown, JAMILA M. BYRD, Next of Kin of Deceased Pamela Jean Johnson and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act/Junk Fax Prevention Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00171
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Davidson et al v. Snyder et al
as 5:2019cv12675
Plaintiff:
T. T.1, Tammy Woofenden, Charles L. Banks and others
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Gerald Ambrose, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
