Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Black v. Royal Oak, City of et al
as 2:2023cv12371
Plaintiff:
Scott Aaron Black [E-filer]
Defendant:
Royal Oak, City of, Nathan Heppner, Joshua Little and others
Joseph Gale v. Corrigan O'Donohue, et al
as 19-1503
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL PARAMO, NATHAN HEPPNER, PHILLIP KLINGE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH BENJAMIN GALE
Gale v. O'Donohue et al
as 2:2017cv12172
Defendant:
Corrigan O'Donohue, Mike Parmo, Nathan Heppner and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv12602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Heppner v. Beck Suppliers, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01147
Plaintiff:
Jon C. Heppner
Defendant:
Beck Suppliers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv12081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mock v. Philip et al
as 1:2010cv00864
Plaintiff:
James Mock
Defendant:
Mark Philip, William Heppner, David Ard and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Ohio and Vicinity Regional Council of Carpenters v. Heppner-Pritt & Associates, Inc.
as 1:2009cv01529
Plaintiff:
Ohio and Vicinity Regional Council of Carpenters and Ohio and Vicinity Regional Council of Carpenters
Defendant:
Heppner-Pritt & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Ohio and Vicinity Regional Council of Carpenters v. Heppner-Pritt & Associates, Inc.
as 5:2009cv01529
Plaintiff:
Ohio and Vicinity Regional Council of Carpenters and Ohio and Vicinity Regional Council of Carpenters
Defendant:
Heppner-Pritt & Associates, Inc. and Heppner-Pritt & Associates, Inc.
Counter-Claimant:
Heppner-Pritt & Associates, Inc. and Heppner-Pritt & Associates, Inc.
Counter-Defendant:
Ohio and Vicinity Regional Council of Carpenters and Ohio and Vicinity Regional Council of Carpenters
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
