Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Troy Manteuffel v. HMS Host Tollroads, Inc.
as 22-3856
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TROY A. MANTEUFFEL
Defendant / Appellee:
HMS HOST TOLLROADS, INC.
Manteuffel v. HMS Host Tollroads, Inc.
as 3:2019cv02924
Defendant:
HMS Host Tollroads, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Troy A Manteuffel and Troy A. Manteuffel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Acey et al v. Autogrill Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02618
Plaintiff:
Janeen Acey and Amber Hopkins
Defendant:
Autogrill Group, Inc. and HMS Host USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Walls et al v. HMSHost Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv00564
Plaintiff:
Walls, Joseph Walls, Dawn Stiger and others
Defendant:
HMSHost Corporation, Host International, Inc., Host Services of New York, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Namiranian et al v. HMSHost, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00947
Plaintiff:
Parivash Namiranian and Tahmuras Namiranian
Defendant:
HMSHost, LLC , HMS Host USA, Inc. and Mission Control Perkins, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Holder et al v. U.S. Foodservice, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02302
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Holder and Martha Holder
Defendant:
U.S. Foodservice, Inc., HMS Host, USA, Inc. , Starbucks Corporation and others
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv13553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Type:
Other Statutes
Holt v. HMS Host USA
as 3:2009cv00344
Plaintiff:
Donna Gail Holt
Defendant:
HMS Host USA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
