Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv04207
Plaintiff:
John W. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv12045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00230
Plaintiff:
John W Smith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Royal Sebring, LLC, et al v Village of Sebring, et al
as 4:2013cv02759
Plaintiff:
Royal Sebring, LLC and Jerome Edward McHugh
Defendant:
Village of Sebring, James Canell, John W. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Smith v. Rob Jeffrey
as 11-4024
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN W. SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
ROB JEFFREYS, Warden
DeBolt et al v. Cassens Transport Co. et al
as 4:2011cv01227
Plaintiff:
Ronnie E. DeBolt , James Elliott , Alan G. Graybeal and others
Defendant:
Cassens Transport Company, Local 377 Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen & Helpers, Kevin Koubeck and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Smith v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution
as 2:2010cv00195
Petitioner:
John W Smith
Respondent:
Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Federal Trade Commission v. Debt Advocacy Center, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv02712
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission, Federal Trade Commission and Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Debt Advocacy Center, LLC, Smith, Gromann & Davidson, P.A., Edward J. Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv12085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
