Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Secretary, Department of Labor v. MICA Contracting, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00590
Defendant:
Timothy Thompson, MICA Contracting, LLC, John Wayne House and others
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor R. Alexander Acosta and Secretary, Department of Labor
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
St Clair v. Ohio Dept. Rehab and Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv01684
Plaintiff:
John Wayne St Clair
Defendant:
Ohio Dept. Rehab and Corrections, Ohio Adult Parole Authority and Lorain Correctional Inst.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Elkins et al
as 4:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Zeb Elkins, Dorothy Powell, Karenetta Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Tate v. FFE Transportation Services, Inc. et al (PLR1)
as 2:2020cv00121
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Tate, Jr.
Defendant:
FFE Transportation Services, Inc. and Mercury Wayne Hayes, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Festerman v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01454
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Festerman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Victor Javitch v. First Union Securities, Inc., et al
as 17-3301
Plaintiff:
VICTOR M. JAVITCH, Receiver
Intervenor - Appellant:
JOHN WAYNE LAZAR and FREDERICK H. STIERHEIM
Defendant - Appellee:
FIRST UNION SECURITIES, INC. and MICHAEL D'ANGELO
Adams v. USA
as 6:2016cv00057
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Wayne Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. John Adam
as 16-5098
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN WAYNE ADAMS
John Collins v. Randy White
as 15-6129
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN WAYNE COLLINS
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY WHITE, Warden
Lawrence v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv00087
Petitioner:
John Wayne Lawrence, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
