Cases 1 - 10 of 19
William Rankin v. Brian Lavan and Associates, P.C., et al
as 23-1949
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. RANKIN
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN LAVAN AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. and COLLENE K. CORCORAN
Rankin v. Brian Lavan and Associates, PC et al
as 5:2023cv12183
Plaintiff:
William A. Rankin
Defendant:
Brian Lavan and Associates, PC and Collene K Corcoran
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Rankin v. Brian Lavan and Associates, PC et al
as 5:2023cv10966
Plaintiff:
William A. Rankin
Defendant:
Brian Lavan and Associates, PC, Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, Joel R. Dault and others
Trustee:
Collene K. Corcoran
Rankin et al v. Brian Lavan and Associates P.C. et al
as 2:2019mc51545
Defendant:
Colleen K. Corcoran and Brian Lavan and Associates P.C.
Plaintiff:
Shirley A.. Rankin and William A. Rankin
Agee et al v. Alphatec Spine, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00750
Defendant:
Alphatec Spine, Inc. and Parcell Laboratories, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michelle Agee , Gayle Bachman , Nick Battista and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GRC Development, LLC v. Lavan et al
as 7:2014cv00142
Plaintiff:
GRC Development, LLC
Defendant:
Kenneth Lavan , Utilicon Corp. , Evergreen National Indemnity Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Glynn v. Glynn et al
as 2:2014cv13204
Plaintiff:
Patricia B Glynn
Defendant:
Edmound Glynn, Betty Kemp, Betty Milton and others
David Scott v. Daniel Burress, et al
as 12-1723
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL BURRESS, BRIAN LAVAN, THOMAS CREMONTE and others
Johnson v. The Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 2:2011cv15027
Plaintiff:
Lavan T. Johnson
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , Bank of America, NA and others
Scott v. Burress et al
as 2:2010cv14937
Plaintiff:
David J Scott
Defendant:
Daniel Burress, Brian Lavan, Thomas Cremonte and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
