Cases 1 - 10 of 148
Garnett v. Meijer Stores Limited Partnership et al
as 5:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Garnett
Defendant:
Meijer Stores Limited Partnership, Meijer, Inc., Meijer Companies, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Nave v. Meijer Stores Limited Partnership
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Nicole Nave
Defendant:
Meijer Stores Limited Partnership doing business as Meijer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Owen v. Meijer, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
James R. Owen
Defendant:
Meijer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mad Mobile, Inc. v. Meijer Great Lakes Limited Partnership
as 1:2023cv01020
Plaintiff:
Mad Mobile, Inc.
Defendant:
Meijer Great Lakes Limited Partnership
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Polce v. Meijer Stores Limited Partnership
as 5:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Patricia Polce
Defendant:
Meijer Stores Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Payne v. Meijer Stores Limited Partnership et al
as 3:2023cv00849
Plaintiff:
Jamie Payne
Defendant:
Meijer Stores Limited Partnership and Meijer Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
