Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3391
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-4062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ohio Bell Telephone Company v. Infrasource Construction, LLC
as 1:2022cv01090
Plaintiff:
Ohio Bell Telephone Company
Defendant:
Infrasource Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Ohio Bell Telephone Company v. Local 4340
as 21-4203
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OHIO BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMUNICATION WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL 4340
Ohio Bell Telephone Company v. Local 4340 Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO
as 1:2021cv00635
Defendant:
Local 4340 Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO and Local 4340, Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO
Plaintiff:
Ohio Bell Telephone Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02178
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Lynum v. Ohio Bell Telephone Company et al
as 1:2019cv01829
Plaintiff:
Jay Lynum
Defendant:
Ohio Bell Telephone Company and Adam Menough
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Jodi Fleming v. Ohio Bell Telephone Company, et al
as 19-3567
Defendant / Appellee:
CEO RANDALL STEPHENSON, JAMES TENCH, Senior Manager, WILLIAM A. BLASE, JR., Vice President of Human Resources and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JODI D. FLEMING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
