Cases 1 - 10 of 2,058
Peters v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02669
Plaintiff:
Merle Peters
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Corwin v. Forth et al
as 3:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Robert Corwin
Defendant:
Brad Forth, Peter Wilver, Ty Daul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Kissimmee Utility Authority Employees' Retirement Plan v. Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Kissimmee Utility Authority Employees' Retirement Plan
Defendant:
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc., Jason R. Whitaker, Jeffery Tolnar and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Peters v. Apel et al
as 2:2024cv11296
Plaintiff:
Julie Elizabeth Peters
Defendant:
Colby Apel and Rokstad Power Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Peters v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65613
Plaintiff:
Ms. Melissa K. Peters
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Swigart v. Erie County et al.
as 3:2024cv00870
Plaintiff:
John Swigart
Defendant:
Erie County, Michael Kennedy and Peter Schade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hunter Doster, et al v. Frank Kendall, III, et al
as 24-3404
Plaintiff:
HUNTER DOSTER, JASON ANDERSON, MCKENNA COLANTANIO and others
Defendant:
HON. FRANK KENDALL, III, In his official capacity as Secretary of the Air Force, LT. GENERAL ROBERT I. MILLER, In his official capacity as Surgeon General of the Air Force, LT. GENERAL BRIAN S. ROBINSON, In his official capacity as Commander, Air Education and Training Command and others
Peters v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02323
Plaintiff:
Laurie Joy Peters
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
