Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lambert v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, et al.
as 3:2019cv00317
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Lambert
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Pennsylvania Lines, LLC, Norfolk Southern Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Lambert et al
as 1:2017cv00657
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Randall L. Lambert, Steven R. Lambert, Joe Elswick and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
USA, ex rel. Marianne Guzall, et al v. City of Romulus, MI, et al
as 17-2056
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel.
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIANNE GUZALL, and MARIANNE D. GUZALL a/k/a MARIANNA GUZALL, individually
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ROMULUS, MI, ALAN R. LAMBERT and BETSEY KRAMPITZ
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Lambert
as 1:2015cv00085
Defendant:
Deanna R. Lambert
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Marianne Guzall, et al v. City of Romulus, et al
as 14-2543
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIANNE GUZALL
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF ROMULUS, ALAN R. LAMBERT and BETSEY KRAMPITZ
Guzall, et al v. Romulus, City of, et al
as 2:2013cv11327
Plaintiff:
Marianne Guzall and United States of America
Defendant:
Romulus, City of , Alan R Lambert and Betsey Krampitz
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America v. Lambert et al
as 1:2012cv00495
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jeannine B. Lambert, Donald R. Lambert, Steven R. Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Equicredit Corporation of America v. Lambert et al
as 2:2007cv00641
Plaintiff:
Equicredit Corporation of America
Defendant:
Erin Ranae Lambert, Unknown Spouse of Erin Ranae Lambert aka Erin R. Lambert and Treasury Department of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
