Cases 1 - 10 of 188
Ramey v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02705
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Ramey
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Williams v. Ramey et al
as 0:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Rodger E. Williams and Willow Williams
Defendant:
Betsy Ramey, Ferguson, President of WellPath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Puckett et al
as 5:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Aaron Reynolds
Defendant:
Joyce L. Puckett, Tracy Bird, Karen Ramey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton v. Smith et al
as 5:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
James R. Patton
Defendant:
Kevin Smith, Karen Ramey, Rick Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Ramey et al
as 3:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Rodger E. Williams and Willow A. Williams
Defendant:
Betsy Ramey, Warden Ferguson, President of WellPath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramey v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02001
Plaintiff:
Douglas Ramey
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Correct-Care Solutions, et al. et al
as 4:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Ricky Bernard Jones
Defendant:
Correct-Care Solutions, et al., Wellpath, Scott Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNichols v. McKenzie et al
as 0:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McNichols
Defendant:
Shawn McKenzie, Brian Dickerson, Joshua Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shannon et al v. Burberry et al
as 5:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Mark Shannon, Jeff Tucker, William Peters and others
Defendant:
West Burberry and Bourbon County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
