Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Kroger Specialty Pharmacy FL 2, LLC v. Genefic Specialty Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01217
Plaintiff:
Kroger Specialty Pharmacy FL 2, LLC
Defendant:
Genefic Specialty Pharmacy, Inc. and Richard Brooks Madison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Douglas Jones, et al v. Kimberley Jacobs, et al
as 23-3797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SERGEANT DOUGLAS JONES, Columbus Division of Police, OFFICER RANDALL LYONS, Columbus Division of Police and OFFICER ANTHONY JOHNSON, Columbus Division of Police
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLEY JACOBS, Columbus Division of Police, DEPUTY CHIEF MICHAEL WOODS, Columbus Division of Police, COMMANDER MARK LANG, Columbus Division of Police and others
Defendant:
OFFICER(S) JOHN DOE, Columbus Division of Police and OFFICER(S) JANE DOE, Columbus Division of Police
Fisi v. Extra Space Storage Inc., et al
as 2:2023cv11825
Plaintiff:
M. Alvin Fisi
Defendant:
Extra Space Storage, Inc., Brittney Unknown, Shilo and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Brooks et al v. C.R Bard Inc et al
as 2:2021cv02552
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R Bard Inc
Plaintiff:
Richard Brooks and Elizabeth Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lyons et al v. Jacobs et al
as 2:2021cv00940
Defendant:
Kimberley Jacobs, Commander Gary Cameron, Lieutenant Wade Spears and others
Plaintiff:
Officer Randall Lyons, Sergeant Douglas Jones and Officer Anthony Johnson
Not Classified By Court:
Matthew D Besser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lyons et al v. Jacobs et al
as 2:2016cv00813
Plaintiff:
Randall Lyons , Anthony Johnson and Douglas Jones
Defendant:
Kim Jacobs, Ron Gray, Ken Kuebler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks et al v. KAG Tank Services, Company et al
as 3:2010cv00342
Plaintiff:
Richard Brooks and Carol Brooks
Defendant:
KAG Tank Services Company and Kenan Advantage Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
