Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Ronald Davis v. Joe Coakley, et al
as 14-3630
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee: JOE COAKLEY, Warden
Ronald Davis v. J. Coakley
as 14-3241
Petitioner - Appellant: RONALD L. DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee: J. COAKLEY, Warden, Warden
Davis v. Bureau of Prisons et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00070
Plaintiff: Ronald L. Davis
Defendant: Bureau of Prisons, Michelle Fulgum, Jane Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Coakley et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00008
Plaintiff: Ronald L. Davis
Defendant: Joe Coakley, Michell Fulgum, K. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Coakley We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv02765
Petitioner: Ronald L. Davis
Respondent: J. Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ronald Davis v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 13-6471
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, individual capacity, JOHN CLARK, the former Director of the United States Marshal's Service ("USMS"), individual capacity and HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, the former Director of the BOP, individual capacity
Ronald Davis v. U.S. Marshal Service, et al
as 13-6469
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE and U.S. MARSHAL JOHN DOE
DAVIS v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2013cv02658
Plaintiff: Ronald L. Davis
Defendant: Eric H. Holder, Jr., John Clark and Harley G. Lappin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Ronald Davi
as 13-5954
Movant: In re: RONALD L. DAVIS
Respondent: TONY HOWERTON, Warden
Ronald Davis v. U.S. Marshal Service, et al
as 13-5911
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD L. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE and JEFFREY A. HEDDEN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?