Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Seymour v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Abigale M. Seymour
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Seymour v. Miller et al
as 2:2021cv00313
Defendant:
Scott Christopher Miller and Village of Coolville, Ohio
Plaintiff:
James Seymour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Transtar Industries, LLC v. Seymour et al
as 1:2021cv00098
Plaintiff:
Transtar Industries, LLC
Defendant:
Powertrain Solutions LLC and Scott Seymour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seymour v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2018cv00614
Plaintiff:
Bryan D. Seymour
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
City of Seymour, Indiana v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45673
Plaintiff:
City of Seymour, Indiana
Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP v. Traverse Realty & Development, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00216
Defendant:
Traverse Realty & Development, LLC and Richard C. Hermann
Plaintiff:
Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seymour v. Magic Industries, Inc
as 2:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
Larry Seymour
Defendant:
Magic Industries, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Seymour v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016cv00744
Plaintiff:
Patty S. Seymour
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Berman v. Lot Number 297, in Berwick Heights No. 2 et al
as 2:2016cv00508
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Berman
Defendant:
Lot Number 297, in Berwick Heights No. 2, Michael B. Coleman , Frankie L. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seymour v. USA
as 1:2015cv02270
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Irving T. Seymour
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
